2024
2023
2021
- Denial of Work-From-Home Requests: A New Era of Discrimination?
- April Showers Bring
- Restrictions on Employee Social Media
- Can Employees Be Forced to Get the Covid-19 Vaccination?
2020
- Holidays...To Pay or Not to Pay, What is Required
- EEOC Update on COVID-19
- Protection of Employee Health Information
- Civil Rights Win for LGBTQ Employees
- OSHA Recordkeeping Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Line Between At-Will Termination and Wrongful Termination
- Regulating Firearms in the Workplace
- Social Media Use in Hiring
2019
2018
- What Not to Wear
- Vicarious Liability for Unlawful Harrassment
- Employee Surveillance & Union Formation
- A Lesson in Retaliation
- Employers May Sometimes Judge a Book By Its Cover
- Mind Your P’s and Q’s . . . and BFOQs
- Severance Agreements
- U.S. Department of Labor "Paid" Program
- Revisiting Records Retention
- Calculating the Regular Rate
- Independent Contractor or Employee?
2017
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- DRI Membership: It’s Personal
- Is Extended Leave a Reasonable Accommodation?
- Parental Leave
- Pay Disparity
- Religious accomodation in the workplace
- Equal pay and prior salary information
- I quit! How to avoid constructive discharge
- You Can't Shred Email
- Navigating Unemployment Claims
- Considering Criminal History in Pre-Employment Decisions
- Defamation Claims from Former Employees
- Mixed Motive Causation
2016
- Requesting Accomodation: Kowitz v. Trinity Health
- Antitrust Law in Human Resources
- An Evolving Standard: Joint-Employment
- What Does At-Will Employment Mean for Employers?
- Let's Talk About Wages
- THE FLSA: CHANGES ARE COMING
- Follow Up: Obesity and the ADA
- The Importance of Social Media Policies
- Is Obesity a Qualifying Disability under the ADA?
- Retaliation on the Rise: The EEOC Responds
- What Motivates You?
2015
- "But I thought ...
- Who’s expecting? And what is he expecting?
- Are You Still Doing Annual Performance Reviews?
- Who is Your Employee?
- The unpaid intern trap Part II
- “We’ve been the victim of a cyber-attack”
- So, a Hasidic Jew, a nun in a habit and a woman wearing a headscarf walk into your office?
- The unpaid intern trap
- Pregnancy in the workplace
- Let's talk about honesty.
- "Did You Know" Series - Part I
- Conducting an Internal Investigation
- What HR can look forward to in 2015!
2014
- The chokehold of workplace technology
- Does your company have trade secrets?
- North Dakota Construction Law Compendium for 2014
- Does the North Dakota baby boom affect you?
- Ban the Box? Why?
- The end of the world as we know it
- Everybody has an opinion
- Changes, Changes, Changes!
- Nick Grant presents at North Dakota Safety Council's 41st Annual Safety and Health Conference
- Email impairment: A potentially harmful condition
Apr 09, 2018
Compliance with wage and hour laws is complicated and riddled with potential pitfalls. The unwary employer may inadvertently run afoul of said laws. Even the most well-intentioned employer may commit a violation. It is oftentimes difficult to determine how to respond, and how to remedy that violation once it has been discovered.
On March 7, 2018, the Department of Labor introduced a new program it says will allow employers a new path for coming into compliance with the law after independently discovering a violation. It is called the Payroll Audit Independent Determination (PAID) Program. Essentially, it provides an employer the ability to self-report FLSA violations and work with the Department of Labor towards resolution of the violation without a full investigation or litigation.
The PAID Program is premised on qualified employers completing self-assessments to ensure compliance with wage and hour laws. Then, if any violation is identified by the employer, it can self-report the violation to the Department. Specific information is required at the time of the report, and the Department is given the opportunity to require submission of additional information. After evaluation, the Department determines the monetary consequences of the violation and supervises payment by the employer to the employee. The employee may then release its claims against the employer (though it is not required).
The main benefit of the Program, according to the Department, is that it saves all parties involved time and money. Further, the Department states that it will not impose fines and liquidated damages penalties on employers who participate in the Program in good faith.
Not all employers will qualify to participate. There are several requirements which all must be met. One of the main requirements is it must be a true self-report. An employer will not qualify for the Program if the employee reports the issue, or if an investigation or litigation is already commenced.
There are still open questions with regard to how the process will work. How long will it take? How extensive will the Department’s review of employer records actually be? What happens if the employer disagrees with the Department’s conclusions? Will there be a chance to appeal? Will an employee still be able to bring state law claims against its employer? This is only a pilot program, which will run for six months. The Department of Labor then plans to evaluate the Program and consider its options to move forward.
Certain commentators have already described the program as a win for employers, employees, and taxpayers. However, it may still be too early to determine the actual effect of the program. Only time will tell if the PAID Program will provide employers with a less adversarial and more expeditious tool to remedy FLSA violations.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at amann@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the April, 2018 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.
U.S. Department of Labor "Paid" Program
By: Allison MannCompliance with wage and hour laws is complicated and riddled with potential pitfalls. The unwary employer may inadvertently run afoul of said laws. Even the most well-intentioned employer may commit a violation. It is oftentimes difficult to determine how to respond, and how to remedy that violation once it has been discovered.
On March 7, 2018, the Department of Labor introduced a new program it says will allow employers a new path for coming into compliance with the law after independently discovering a violation. It is called the Payroll Audit Independent Determination (PAID) Program. Essentially, it provides an employer the ability to self-report FLSA violations and work with the Department of Labor towards resolution of the violation without a full investigation or litigation.
The PAID Program is premised on qualified employers completing self-assessments to ensure compliance with wage and hour laws. Then, if any violation is identified by the employer, it can self-report the violation to the Department. Specific information is required at the time of the report, and the Department is given the opportunity to require submission of additional information. After evaluation, the Department determines the monetary consequences of the violation and supervises payment by the employer to the employee. The employee may then release its claims against the employer (though it is not required).
The main benefit of the Program, according to the Department, is that it saves all parties involved time and money. Further, the Department states that it will not impose fines and liquidated damages penalties on employers who participate in the Program in good faith.
Not all employers will qualify to participate. There are several requirements which all must be met. One of the main requirements is it must be a true self-report. An employer will not qualify for the Program if the employee reports the issue, or if an investigation or litigation is already commenced.
There are still open questions with regard to how the process will work. How long will it take? How extensive will the Department’s review of employer records actually be? What happens if the employer disagrees with the Department’s conclusions? Will there be a chance to appeal? Will an employee still be able to bring state law claims against its employer? This is only a pilot program, which will run for six months. The Department of Labor then plans to evaluate the Program and consider its options to move forward.
Certain commentators have already described the program as a win for employers, employees, and taxpayers. However, it may still be too early to determine the actual effect of the program. Only time will tell if the PAID Program will provide employers with a less adversarial and more expeditious tool to remedy FLSA violations.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at amann@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the April, 2018 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.