2024
2023
2021
- Denial of Work-From-Home Requests: A New Era of Discrimination?
- April Showers Bring
- Restrictions on Employee Social Media
- Can Employees Be Forced to Get the Covid-19 Vaccination?
2020
- Holidays...To Pay or Not to Pay, What is Required
- EEOC Update on COVID-19
- Protection of Employee Health Information
- Civil Rights Win for LGBTQ Employees
- OSHA Recordkeeping Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Line Between At-Will Termination and Wrongful Termination
- Regulating Firearms in the Workplace
- Social Media Use in Hiring
2019
2018
- What Not to Wear
- Vicarious Liability for Unlawful Harrassment
- Employee Surveillance & Union Formation
- A Lesson in Retaliation
- Employers May Sometimes Judge a Book By Its Cover
- Mind Your P’s and Q’s . . . and BFOQs
- Severance Agreements
- U.S. Department of Labor "Paid" Program
- Revisiting Records Retention
- Calculating the Regular Rate
- Independent Contractor or Employee?
2017
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- DRI Membership: It’s Personal
- Is Extended Leave a Reasonable Accommodation?
- Parental Leave
- Pay Disparity
- Religious accomodation in the workplace
- Equal pay and prior salary information
- I quit! How to avoid constructive discharge
- You Can't Shred Email
- Navigating Unemployment Claims
- Considering Criminal History in Pre-Employment Decisions
- Defamation Claims from Former Employees
- Mixed Motive Causation
2016
- Requesting Accomodation: Kowitz v. Trinity Health
- Antitrust Law in Human Resources
- An Evolving Standard: Joint-Employment
- What Does At-Will Employment Mean for Employers?
- Let's Talk About Wages
- THE FLSA: CHANGES ARE COMING
- Follow Up: Obesity and the ADA
- The Importance of Social Media Policies
- Is Obesity a Qualifying Disability under the ADA?
- Retaliation on the Rise: The EEOC Responds
- What Motivates You?
2015
- "But I thought ...
- Who’s expecting? And what is he expecting?
- Are You Still Doing Annual Performance Reviews?
- Who is Your Employee?
- The unpaid intern trap Part II
- “We’ve been the victim of a cyber-attack”
- So, a Hasidic Jew, a nun in a habit and a woman wearing a headscarf walk into your office?
- The unpaid intern trap
- Pregnancy in the workplace
- Let's talk about honesty.
- "Did You Know" Series - Part I
- Conducting an Internal Investigation
- What HR can look forward to in 2015!
2014
- The chokehold of workplace technology
- Does your company have trade secrets?
- North Dakota Construction Law Compendium for 2014
- Does the North Dakota baby boom affect you?
- Ban the Box? Why?
- The end of the world as we know it
- Everybody has an opinion
- Changes, Changes, Changes!
- Nick Grant presents at North Dakota Safety Council's 41st Annual Safety and Health Conference
- Email impairment: A potentially harmful condition
Oct 25, 2023
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) has taken the world by storm. Professors are having to warn their students not to use AI to generate research papers. Professionals are uploading new LinkedIn headshots of themselves that were created by AI rather than an actual photographer. The advancement, availability, and “user-friendliness” of AI is changing many aspects of society, including how employers conduct their hiring processes. Typically, the hiring process includes filling out an application, conducting some sort of background check, and having an interview. By involving AI, employers have found that they can streamline this process, specifically when it comes to screening applicants. However, employers should be prepared for potential discrimination actions that may arise from using AI to screen applicants.
In 2022, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) commenced a lawsuit against a tutoring company, iTutorGroup Inc., for its use of AI in violation of anti-discrimination laws. iTutorGroup hired tutors based in the United States to provide online tutoring from their homes or other remote locations. According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, iTutorGroup programmed their tutor application software to automatically reject female applicants aged 55 or older and male applicants aged 60 or older. iTutorGroup rejected more than 200 qualified applicants based in the United States because of their age, which was a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”).
In August 2023, the EEOC and iTutorGroup were able to reach a settlement, which included iTutorGroup paying $365,000 to the applicants that were automatically rejected due to age. Additionally, the settlement decree provided for significant non-monetary relief, including extensive and continuing training, issuance of a new anti-discrimination policy, and injunctions against discriminatory hiring based on age or sex and requesting applicant’s birth dates. The EEOC will be monitoring iTutorGroup’s compliance with these obligations for at least the next five years.
The Takeaway:
EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc., et al., was the first lawsuit brought by the EEOC for employment discrimination involving AI, but it certainly won’t be the last. The EEOC has made it clear it will put significant focus on ensuring that employers are complying with anti-discrimination laws when using AI. With AI becoming more prevalent in the hiring process, it is important that employers ensure that their use of AI is in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Employers are well advised to seek legal counsel when confronted with possible employment discrimination.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at mcerkoney@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the October, 2023 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.
EEOC Cracks Down On AI Use In Hiring
By: Marissa CerkoneyArtificial intelligence (“AI”) has taken the world by storm. Professors are having to warn their students not to use AI to generate research papers. Professionals are uploading new LinkedIn headshots of themselves that were created by AI rather than an actual photographer. The advancement, availability, and “user-friendliness” of AI is changing many aspects of society, including how employers conduct their hiring processes. Typically, the hiring process includes filling out an application, conducting some sort of background check, and having an interview. By involving AI, employers have found that they can streamline this process, specifically when it comes to screening applicants. However, employers should be prepared for potential discrimination actions that may arise from using AI to screen applicants.
In 2022, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) commenced a lawsuit against a tutoring company, iTutorGroup Inc., for its use of AI in violation of anti-discrimination laws. iTutorGroup hired tutors based in the United States to provide online tutoring from their homes or other remote locations. According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, iTutorGroup programmed their tutor application software to automatically reject female applicants aged 55 or older and male applicants aged 60 or older. iTutorGroup rejected more than 200 qualified applicants based in the United States because of their age, which was a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”).
In August 2023, the EEOC and iTutorGroup were able to reach a settlement, which included iTutorGroup paying $365,000 to the applicants that were automatically rejected due to age. Additionally, the settlement decree provided for significant non-monetary relief, including extensive and continuing training, issuance of a new anti-discrimination policy, and injunctions against discriminatory hiring based on age or sex and requesting applicant’s birth dates. The EEOC will be monitoring iTutorGroup’s compliance with these obligations for at least the next five years.
The Takeaway:
EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc., et al., was the first lawsuit brought by the EEOC for employment discrimination involving AI, but it certainly won’t be the last. The EEOC has made it clear it will put significant focus on ensuring that employers are complying with anti-discrimination laws when using AI. With AI becoming more prevalent in the hiring process, it is important that employers ensure that their use of AI is in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Employers are well advised to seek legal counsel when confronted with possible employment discrimination.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at mcerkoney@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the October, 2023 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.